If you give priority to taking a picture first, a powerful choice

When I saw the real machine for the first time in the shop, "I am somewhat decky ..." Honestly I thought it was 10 minutes 15 minutes 20 minutes, is that it? Is it easy to have it? ... Although Panasonic may have failed in miniaturization (rude !!) Halling is perfect ... but the deck does not disappear ... but the EVF finder is also using Nikon full of daily work at work It might be bigger than the size, and the image quality looked like a very good class in EVF, it seemed like Panasonic and it looks like backside of the back monitor and it feels quite chatty, feeling that it can not be something else ... (rude!) Well after thinking for a moment like an excuse After all, although it buys after all ... ... (Uh, I'm sorry wife !!) After all, while I am using it, I do not mind decking, because it is quite normal because the Four Thirds, but the lightness of the equipment does not change even with GX 8, When I go to take a picture in this back, what is the difference in consumption of physical strength and energy as in the case of having a full-size SLR with the same contents? Physical strength If there is no afford in vision, it is also a thing that I do not feel like photographing, and it is not necessary element in the sense that taking the first thing is important, why it is necessary for full size or more equipment If there is a story if it is different though it is about image quality ... If it is said about image quality ... It is natural that it is GX 8 but it is progressing, the number of pixels is also effective 20 M. It seems that the picture becomes coarse due to the area reduction per pixel on the sensor than 16 M Although I was a little worried, even on PC monitors such as during development, it is not felt special by the naked eye ... good enough picture comes out, there are also shades of the lens, but both gradation coloring is good and somewhat before It is not felt that "the roughness of the paintings of a variety of greedy results" that existed in the model, there is no doubt that even if a fine stinginess is attached, as "impression" it is "an honest picture" AF is fast Although it depends on why fast ... use lens, or would be felt to say that there is any judgment say that there is no stress? If there is the minimum necessary contrast in the focus area, the "normal" pin will come. However, although old lenses such as MACRO-ELMARIT 45 mm / 2.8 update the firmware, there is a point where AF is not so good I think it's only a matter of turning helicoids by myself when going in the pins and it is a macro and it is wondering what Panasonic thinks that this lens is lineup honestly, a terrible lens Personally, my favorite picture comes out from SUMMILUX 25 mm / 1.4 The bundled RAW development software is honestly not recommended as my personal opinion at all, if possible Capture One or adobe is recommended, I am using Capture One

LUMIX G VARIO 7-14 mm I want to use it

As a candidate for the main body is GF 7, G 7 (8), GX 7 MK 2, etc, performance aside Aside to Akiba Yodobashi to the thought Akiba Yodobashi First, GF 7 has no finder and is too small and firm It is convenient to carry, but it is incompatible size when using a large lens GX 8 is certainly as large as a mirrorless but heavy, but it can be brought to a glance Secondly, the GX 7 MK 2 feels inconvenient that the liquid crystal operates only upward GX8 is liquid crystal Kuruttotoruta one rotation and can be lost Convenient during storage Finally compared with G8, this is already a real difference difference, I feel that GX is simpler and easier to manipulate with unevenness I like retro and so I like it

It is a nice camera ♪

I think that each camera you choose depends on the purpose of the camera. If you choose image quality, APS-C and m4 / 3 are not enemies to full size regardless of how you think, so it will not be subject to comparison. I think the time of taking pictures as a lifestyle carefully, at the level of snap center, occasionally the majestic nature can be taken. I thought it was a perfect camera for me, and I am satisfied very much when I actually use it. If it is the same Panasonic mid-level machine, rather G8 was recommended by most shops, but since the camera itself's design and texture is inferior to the G8 because it is almost impossible to shoot videos, I decided to do it here . Ownership feeling / texture is also an important point in having things. In addition to the 14-140 mm / f 3.5-5.6 lens included in the kit, Pana-Leica Summilux 25 mm / f 1.4, Pana-Leica Macro Elmarit 45 mm / f 2.8, and Olympus 7-14 mm / f 2. I am using 8 PRO. I think that it is the greatest attraction of a small camera that it is possible to go in shooting with the main body and 4 lenses in the bag. If it is the same standard, there is not much difference in performance unless it is a very old product, I think that it is important to choose a good lens.

What!

The best! The best! I got lost ... but it was good to buy! I have a Nikon D7000, but recently when I watched the 28-300 telephoto lens and shot it on hand I increased the magnification with a personal computer and the blurring often increased (old age) So I got a light GX 8. I'm evolving, I was surprised. Taking good pictures = Basics of operation is master · · · so I am special training at the head of Koki. The greatest feature of this camera is amazing enough to say that it will run out at the speed of AF. Even if you change the composition from a subject in a distant view to a subject at a closest distance, it will instantly adjust the focus. It feels good. Besides this, the continuous shooting function applying the 4K motion picture function is really fun.

G8 came

I ordered GX8 but G8 came by mistake shipping Originally I was worried about GX 8 and G 8, so the exterior is a bit cheap but I am thinking whether to use the seller as it is. I'm worried about whether it is "lucky" or "hmm". Although we have GX7 G7, as for the camera, the GX series is better than the G series, although the grade will be higher, but the latest model G8 Dustproof Splash-proof vibration reduction + 5 axis correction Although I know I can design I feel

Light and good footwork camera

I am using α7s on the main, but I bought it because I wanted a light sub. I was troubled with Olympus' E - M 1 and the end, but decided here with or without 4 KPHOTO. First of all, it is unpopular size "decky deck", but this is subjective and changes with everything. If you are using Condeji or MFS so far, you will think that it is "deca!" As a person who has used D700 + Sigma 150-500, this is a light weakness at all. Almost the same size and weight as full size α 7 s ... Is this α 7 s too small? Rather, if it is a hand of an adult man, there is a fear that the feeling of hold may be impaired if there is not this size. At first glance it is good visibility of EVF. Since it is 0.77 times and the field of view that is equal to the full size, the impression when peeking is also one piece. Since the EVF of α7s is 0.7 times, it seems that full-size EVF looks like a chat (lol I was not worried, so at present it is one of the best EVFs, and if the sky is cloudy if the sky is clear Although there is a minute in the gradation of α 7s, the GX 8 is preeminent in high definition.It often says "Many MFS is full size ...", but this also depends on the shooting style Taking a sticky tripod and shooting one by one, taking RAW over time, print it to A1 or A2 size and print it out, it may not be satisfactory, but please take it out quickly If it is snap shot, L or A4 print, it is enough to withstand viewing.However, in high sensitivity shooting it does not fall under the feet of α7s.It is bad for comparison, but please still stick to ISO 1600 The operation feeling is truly well thought out as a household electric appliance etc. It has many function keys and it corresponds also to the operation of the moment.The photography while moving the focus with the touch pad, especially once you experience it, However, the position and hardness of the exposure compensation dial will be roomable for improvement but I will fix the exposure by looking through the viewfinder and locking it with halfway press of the shutter Shutter erroneous accident occurred frequently to the hardness of too much I want you to lighten a little more or be able to allocate to front and rear dial · · · 14-140 of the kit lens is also small for the magnification, I am satisfied with α7s 24 to 240, because it is half the size, one third by weight, since the original telephoto was the objective, I obtained 100-400 of Pana and tried it In addition, 4KPHOTO is especially useful, especially 4K pre-firework is convenient.I tried to shoot a little bird, but the yield is much better than the α7s.If you do not mind the image size, the best bird shoot I think that it is the mode suitable for the past.It was taken several moments of fire at the D700 but this seems to be successful with a considerable probability.EVF visibility · High follow-up and blue impulse also seems to be pursuing It is a great advantage here because Panasonic only obtains 4K movie at a price of less than 100,000 yen, but I wrote a blurred comment on it Also it can be used for full-blown photography, it is small and lightweight, the price is a little more .... I also have camera shake in the body and it is useful as a mother ship of an old lens, so I think that it is a camera worth considering except for those who are absolutely not full size.

It is nothing if it comes to deck that carries a single eye of the past

I am not the one who enlivened the camera very much. Because it is a mere person with a hobby, please read on that intention. Although it is a little big camera, I think the size seen from the front is the same as the camera of the old range finder. It is probably a question of whether it is easy to carry or easy to use. Although it tends to want to be smaller if it is a camera without a penta prism, the old-fashioned deca is quite appreciated when using it, the hold feeling is also good. Then, although it is a lens, the current lens is not quite large, but it is quite good. A set of 14-140 lenses are lighter and aspherical like multiple as usual. Multiple ED lenses are used ... In the old days it is super luxury. I am surely satisfied with ordinary people who were satisfied with the old eye. I tried using the converter with a large diameter middle telephoto zoom that I used before, but I tried using it with manual focus, but the lens of the set is better ... as soon as I felt somewhat lonely.

Easy to use!

Originally it was a single-lens reflex camera of Nikon, and then I went over with Olympus ~ Pana ~ Fuji but I mainly use Fuji in recent years. I bought this camera (14-140 kit) and 100-400 together because I wanted to take pictures of birds, insects and other wild animals. Like FZ1000 you used to patronize before, you can do various settings, sort function buttons, how to operate, etc. without getting lost easily. It's a pity to compare it to Fuji, but it's pretty strict about high sensitivity, my tolerance is up to iso 800. Instead, I also have a new feature called dual camera shake correction so I think that that point will be offset. Some people are said to be big, but for me it is a bit small. I think that the grip is well lightweight and highly finished mirrorless.