Fit perfectly in the ear

It is smaller than SHURE and is perfectly fits comfortably in the ear (rather than it felt). Even if the ear pads are mistakenly selected, the fit feeling is not hesitant. However, it seems that the sound needs aging. It is not bad at all, but I feel a little thin. Before hearing it is a star reduction. == Additional description == I have aged about 50 hours, but nothing changes. So I will reduce one star. If you keep this sound it is not worth giving out this price. It's just "that fender" so I will continue to use it for about a year.

Recognition for canal type has changed

I usually use canal type (silicon chip sealed type) and inner ear type (pad open type) depending on the situation considering characteristics and advantages and disadvantages, but it is effective for sound leakage prevention as the spread of smartphone Canal type earphone has become extremely difficult to increase makers and product numbers with a tremendous momentum, judging only by brand and price. Even if individual preference or tendency to sound quality is subtracted, there is no proportional relationship between product price and sound quality, so it is difficult to choose. Until now, for the canal type, it has been mostly the impression that "low frequencies stay more than necessary", "high tones lose transparency" and "separation of sounds is low". I thought that the more popular the low-priced products, the more the traditional inner ear type was better reproducibility from bass to treble, but this relatively expensive product exceeding 10,000 yen I was betrayed in a good way. There is no unpleasant reverberation feeling that bass and treble mix in the stopped ears. It sounds a very clear sound. I think that such earphone without peculiarity is suitable because it is necessary to grasp various elements of sound for monitoring in music production. When performing overdubbing in the remix work, I felt that delicate response such as editing mistake etc. which was not noticed by the monitor earphone which used so far is also characterized as soon as possible. Just listening to existing music (downloading, streaming, CD, etc.) can be done by selecting in advance the earphone suitable for that sound that matches your favorite genre, so for users seeking dynamic sounds, This product which is superior in depicting detail with depiction may feel somewhat unsatisfactory. Except for those who produce something myself regardless of professional or amateurs, I feel that there is absolutely no need to use this product to be honest. I do not understand this design intention, it is beyond my expectation to listen and compare the good or bad of the sounds under the same conditions, and it is unexpected that users with arbitrary belief that professional specification = high sound quality are "cheapest one" As you leave a comment to lament that "I am disappointed and disappointed," it shows how many buyers are looking for "fish bordering on trees." In order to ascertain whether it is worth the price, there is no need to purchase and lose something like purchase as possessed. Unfortunately this unfortunate mismatch will not be solved unless manufacturers and dealers also notify the characteristics of this product. It is epochal that two types of different shapes are prepared in the silicon ear tip (3 pairs plus one pair in total of 4 pairs). There is no instruction manual on the sample at hand, there is no manual notation or manual download on the maker HP, so I will explain it by myself as A type, B type by yourself. A type: hemispherical type Three sizes of S / M / L are prepared near the conventional chip. B type: Bowl shape It has a shape like a "bottom of the thread" which looks like "Ocho bowl" turned over with a different shape from the previous one. It is about M size and only one size. It seems that the distance to the tympanic membrane changes so that it enters into the ear hole delicately deeply because the tip is narrowed and the position to hold the body is different from the A type. The shape of B type can be confirmed by Amazon product image. Actually, with regard to these canal formulas, the choice of the ear tip is extremely important, and the sound quality will change garish just by replacing the chip. Since I was able to fit in my own with the Canal type chip I used so far, I chose the B type at the beginning, but I decided that the sound is confined and there is a feeling of blockage, uncomfortable and not suitable for myself , I tried A type M size. Although it was tolerable, it was not good either, and it settled down to the A type S size (the smallest chip). The sound quality of preference was obtained such as natural sound spreading and omission of beautiful treble, nothing but rich bass. Corresponding to the difference and the length of the ear hole shape of each person by a total of four ear tips, probably one of them seems to match, so trying these things that match the sound you want while facing the hole of your ear We recommend. I think that you can find the best combination by choosing the most suitable one by removing the prejudice from the size that you think is fit for yourself. However, the target of survey at the time of designing is European and American Ear chips are generally large, even with the smallest size, the outer diameter is about 11.5 mm, which is too big for me. Long wearing is very painful as my ears get hurt. This ear tip is poorly molded, and it has elasticity because it is thick silicon, so if the size does not match, the designed sound quality can not be obtained. Rather than using Fender's ear tip in addition to that, we recommend that you use the other manufacturer's products rather than this (after a while from this initial review post, I have nothing to do with part of Panasonic I found a small ear tip of about 10 mm that fits perfectly with the Fender at the spare, and now I use it.) Considering Asians and petite people, women, and minors, I think that it is actually necessary to have even smaller sizes for both A type and B type, so I would like to ask for correspondence to products by all means. As long as manufacturers do not practice such fine attention, no product will absolutely spread. The length of the protruding part of the L type connector is as small as about 11 mm and it does not become an obstacle. It is very light with the total weight of 14 g (1 to 2 g of one ear, all 10 g of detachable cable)) and it is the same type as SHURE to put the cable on the ear, so touch noise when the cable rubs against clothes is less likely to occur and it is comfortable (There is no maker explanation about this "SHURE hanging" which wears the cable from the back of the ear lobe by turning around the ear forward. Although the cable is a removable replaceable type, it is not commercially available and can be repaired and replaced by the manufacturer. A further higher model is prepared and this product is an entry model, but I thought it was a very good quality monitor that accurately reproduced the sound. Make a beautiful sound as a beautiful sound ... Make a mistake if you make a mistake you will notice that mistake ... For me it is a very grateful tool (by the way Apple 's white earphone has a wonderful balance that does not exaggerate any frequency band and is perfect for editing Since it is not an iPhone user, I purchase it and purchase it.The inner model of the old model is limited to those who are large in diameter and can fit in the tragus and there are many people who can not listen to the original sounds, Thunderbroaders asked for other products.The cable type ear pods are innovative designed earphones that do not require ear tips because of the best sound quality Both old and new confirm sounds which removed thickened makeup It is an indispensable effective monitor to do). I like simple cables with nothing, but there are also microphones and remote control loaded type (black and white, three colors). Fender Earphone 8.5 mm Titanium Dynamic Type High Sound Isolating Canal Type Black CXA 1 - BLACK [Domestic Genuine Products] Manufacturer 's Fender calls this Canal type product inserted in the ear canal "in-ear monitor". The inner ear type is a conventional type that hooks outside the ear canal after WALKMAN of SONY, but the overhead type which was common before that is giving out a sound outside the earlobe, in the nuance named in the earlobe "inner ear It is said to be type. The SONY which created that word recently became to be used for the canal type and the notation confusion has occurred, so it is good to unify them to names that do not lead to misunderstanding (incidentally Panasonic is "Inside phone" is called).

Since it is an evaluation for the sample provided by the manufacturer, if there is a problem part, we will report it further at that point.

I usually use canal type (silicon chip sealed type) and inner ear type (pad open type) depending on the situation considering characteristics and advantages and disadvantages, but it is effective for sound leakage prevention as the spread of smartphone Canal type earphone has become extremely difficult to increase makers and product numbers with a tremendous momentum, judging only by brand and price. Even if individual preference or tendency to sound quality is subtracted, there is no proportional relationship between product price and sound quality, so it is difficult to choose. Until now, for the canal type, it has been mostly the impression that "low frequencies stay more than necessary", "high tones lose transparency" and "separation of sounds is low". I thought that the more popular the low-priced products, the more the traditional inner ear type was better reproducibility from bass to treble, but this relatively expensive product exceeding 10,000 yen I was betrayed in a good way. There is no unpleasant reverberation feeling that bass and treble mix in the stopped ears. It sounds a very clear sound. I think that such earphone without peculiarity is suitable because it is necessary to grasp various elements of sound for monitoring in music production. When performing overdubbing in the remix work, I felt that delicate response such as editing mistake etc. which was not noticed by the monitor earphone which used so far is also characterized as soon as possible. Just listening to existing music (downloading, streaming, CD, etc.) can be done by selecting in advance the earphone suitable for that sound that matches your favorite genre, so for users seeking dynamic sounds, This product which is superior in depicting detail with depiction may feel somewhat unsatisfactory. Except for those who produce something myself regardless of professional or amateurs, I feel that there is absolutely no need to use this product to be honest. I do not understand this design intention, it is beyond my expectation to listen and compare the good or bad of the sounds under the same conditions, and it is unexpected that users with arbitrary belief that professional specification = high sound quality are "cheapest one" As you leave a comment to lament that "I am disappointed and disappointed," it shows how many buyers are looking for "fish bordering on trees." In order to ascertain whether it is worth the price, there is no need to purchase and lose something like purchase as possessed. Unfortunately this unfortunate mismatch will not be solved unless manufacturers and dealers also notify the characteristics of this product. It is epochal that two types of different shapes are prepared in the silicon ear tip (3 pairs plus one pair in total of 4 pairs). There is no instruction manual on the sample at hand, there is no manual notation or manual download on the maker HP, so I will explain it by myself as A type, B type by yourself. A type: hemispherical type Three sizes of S / M / L are prepared near the conventional chip. B type: Bowl shape It has a shape like a "bottom of the thread" which looks like "Ocho bowl" turned over with a different shape from the previous one. It is about M size and only one size. It seems that the distance to the tympanic membrane changes so that it enters into the ear hole delicately deeply because the tip is narrowed and the position to hold the body is different from the A type. The shape of B type can be confirmed by Amazon product image. Actually, with regard to these canal formulas, the choice of the ear tip is extremely important, and the sound quality will change garish just by replacing the chip. Since I was able to fit in my own with the Canal type chip I used so far, I chose the B type at the beginning, but I decided that the sound is confined and there is a feeling of blockage, uncomfortable and not suitable for myself , I tried A type M size. Although it was tolerable, it was not good either, and it settled down to the A type S size (the smallest chip). The sound quality of preference was obtained such as natural sound spreading and omission of beautiful treble, nothing but rich bass. Corresponding to the difference and the length of the ear hole shape of each person by a total of four ear tips, probably one of them seems to match, so trying these things that match the sound you want while facing the hole of your ear We recommend. I think that you can find the best combination by choosing the most suitable one by removing the prejudice from the size that you think is fit for yourself. However, the target of survey at the time of designing is European and American Ear chips are generally large, even with the smallest size, the outer diameter is about 11.5 mm, which is too big for me. Long wearing is very painful as my ears get hurt. This ear tip is poorly molded, and it has elasticity because it is thick silicon, so if the size does not match, the designed sound quality can not be obtained. Rather than using Fender's ear tip in addition to that, we recommend that you use the other manufacturer's products rather than this (after a while from this initial review post, I have nothing to do with part of Panasonic I found a small ear tip of about 10 mm that fits perfectly with the Fender at the spare, and now I use it.) Considering Asians and petite people, women, and minors, I think that it is actually necessary to have even smaller sizes for both A type and B type, so I would like to ask for correspondence to products by all means. As long as manufacturers do not practice such fine attention, no product will absolutely spread. The length of the protruding part of the L type connector is as small as about 11 mm and it does not become an obstacle. It is very light with the total weight of 14 g (1 to 2 g of one ear, all 10 g of detachable cable)) and it is the same type as SHURE to put the cable on the ear, so touch noise when the cable rubs against clothes is less likely to occur and it is comfortable (There is no maker explanation about this "SHURE hanging" which wears the cable from the back of the ear lobe by turning around the ear forward. Although the cable is a removable replaceable type, it is not commercially available and can be repaired and replaced by the manufacturer. A further higher model is prepared and this product is an entry model, but I thought it was a very good quality monitor that accurately reproduced the sound. Make a beautiful sound as a beautiful sound ... Make a mistake if you make a mistake you will notice that mistake ... For me it is a very grateful tool (by the way Apple 's white earphone has a wonderful balance that does not exaggerate any frequency band and is perfect for editing Since it is not an iPhone user, I purchase it and purchase it.The inner model of the old model is limited to those who are large in diameter and can fit in the tragus and there are many people who can not listen to the original sounds, Thunderbroaders asked for other products.The cable type ear pods are innovative designed earphones that do not require ear tips because of the best sound quality Both old and new confirm sounds which removed thickened makeup It is an indispensable effective monitor to do). I like simple cables with nothing, but there are also microphones and remote control loaded type (black and white, three colors). Fender Earphone 8.5 mm Titanium Dynamic Type High Sound Isolating Canal Type Black CXA 1 - BLACK [Domestic Genuine Products] Manufacturer 's Fender calls this Canal type product inserted in the ear canal "in-ear monitor". The inner ear type is a conventional type that hooks outside the ear canal after WALKMAN of SONY, but the overhead type which was common before that is giving out a sound outside the earlobe, in the nuance named in the earlobe "inner ear It is said to be type. The SONY which created that word recently became to be used for the canal type and the notation confusion has occurred, so it is good to unify them to names that do not lead to misunderstanding (incidentally Panasonic is "Inside phone" is called).

After several reviews of Vine samples are posted, you can see suspicious general posts by the same person trying to raise product evaluation using multiple accounts.

I usually use canal type (silicon chip sealed type) and inner ear type (pad open type) depending on the situation considering characteristics and advantages and disadvantages, but it is effective for sound leakage prevention as the spread of smartphone Canal type earphone has become extremely difficult to increase makers and product numbers with a tremendous momentum, judging only by brand and price. Even if individual preference or tendency to sound quality is subtracted, there is no proportional relationship between product price and sound quality, so it is difficult to choose. Until now, for the canal type, it has been mostly the impression that "low frequencies stay more than necessary", "high tones lose transparency" and "separation of sounds is low". I thought that the more popular the low-priced products, the more the traditional inner ear type was better reproducibility from bass to treble, but this relatively expensive product exceeding 10,000 yen I was betrayed in a good way. There is no unpleasant reverberation feeling that bass and treble mix in the stopped ears. It sounds a very clear sound. I think that such earphone without peculiarity is suitable because it is necessary to grasp various elements of sound for monitoring in music production. When performing overdubbing in the remix work, I felt that delicate response such as editing mistake etc. which was not noticed by the monitor earphone which used so far is also characterized as soon as possible. Just listening to existing music (downloading, streaming, CD, etc.) can be done by selecting in advance the earphone suitable for that sound that matches your favorite genre, so for users seeking dynamic sounds, This product which is superior in depicting detail with depiction may feel somewhat unsatisfactory. Except for those who produce something myself regardless of professional or amateurs, I feel that there is absolutely no need to use this product to be honest. I do not understand this design intention, it is beyond my expectation to listen and compare the good or bad of the sounds under the same conditions, and it is unexpected that users with arbitrary belief that professional specification = high sound quality are "cheapest one" As you leave a comment to lament that "I am disappointed and disappointed," it shows how many buyers are looking for "fish bordering on trees." In order to ascertain whether it is worth the price, there is no need to purchase and lose something like purchase as possessed. Unfortunately this unfortunate mismatch will not be solved unless manufacturers and dealers also notify the characteristics of this product. It is epochal that two types of different shapes are prepared in the silicon ear tip (3 pairs plus one pair in total of 4 pairs). There is no instruction manual on the sample at hand, there is no manual notation or manual download on the maker HP, so I will explain it by myself as A type, B type by yourself. A type: hemispherical type Three sizes of S / M / L are prepared near the conventional chip. B type: Bowl shape It has a shape like a "bottom of the thread" which looks like "Ocho bowl" turned over with a different shape from the previous one. It is about M size and only one size. It seems that the distance to the tympanic membrane changes so that it enters into the ear hole delicately deeply because the tip is narrowed and the position to hold the body is different from the A type. The shape of B type can be confirmed by Amazon product image. Actually, with regard to these canal formulas, the choice of the ear tip is extremely important, and the sound quality will change garish just by replacing the chip. Since I was able to fit in my own with the Canal type chip I used so far, I chose the B type at the beginning, but I decided that the sound is confined and there is a feeling of blockage, uncomfortable and not suitable for myself , I tried A type M size. Although it was tolerable, it was not good either, and it settled down to the A type S size (the smallest chip). The sound quality of preference was obtained such as natural sound spreading and omission of beautiful treble, nothing but rich bass. Corresponding to the difference and the length of the ear hole shape of each person by a total of four ear tips, probably one of them seems to match, so trying these things that match the sound you want while facing the hole of your ear We recommend. I think that you can find the best combination by choosing the most suitable one by removing the prejudice from the size that you think is fit for yourself. However, the target of survey at the time of designing is European and American Ear chips are generally large, even with the smallest size, the outer diameter is about 11.5 mm, which is too big for me. Long wearing is very painful as my ears get hurt. This ear tip is poorly molded, and it has elasticity because it is thick silicon, so if the size does not match, the designed sound quality can not be obtained. Rather than using Fender's ear tip in addition to that, we recommend that you use the other manufacturer's products rather than this (after a while from this initial review post, I have nothing to do with part of Panasonic I found a small ear tip of about 10 mm that fits perfectly with the Fender at the spare, and now I use it.) Considering Asians and petite people, women, and minors, I think that it is actually necessary to have even smaller sizes for both A type and B type, so I would like to ask for correspondence to products by all means. As long as manufacturers do not practice such fine attention, no product will absolutely spread. The length of the protruding part of the L type connector is as small as about 11 mm and it does not become an obstacle. It is very light with the total weight of 14 g (1 to 2 g of one ear, all 10 g of detachable cable)) and it is the same type as SHURE to put the cable on the ear, so touch noise when the cable rubs against clothes is less likely to occur and it is comfortable (There is no maker explanation about this "SHURE hanging" which wears the cable from the back of the ear lobe by turning around the ear forward. Although the cable is a removable replaceable type, it is not commercially available and can be repaired and replaced by the manufacturer. A further higher model is prepared and this product is an entry model, but I thought it was a very good quality monitor that accurately reproduced the sound. Make a beautiful sound as a beautiful sound ... Make a mistake if you make a mistake you will notice that mistake ... For me it is a very grateful tool (by the way Apple 's white earphone has a wonderful balance that does not exaggerate any frequency band and is perfect for editing Since it is not an iPhone user, I purchase it and purchase it.The inner model of the old model is limited to those who are large in diameter and can fit in the tragus and there are many people who can not listen to the original sounds, Thunderbroaders asked for other products.The cable type ear pods are innovative designed earphones that do not require ear tips because of the best sound quality Both old and new confirm sounds which removed thickened makeup It is an indispensable effective monitor to do). I like simple cables with nothing, but there are also microphones and remote control loaded type (black and white, three colors). Fender Earphone 8.5 mm Titanium Dynamic Type High Sound Isolating Canal Type Black CXA 1 - BLACK [Domestic Genuine Products] Manufacturer 's Fender calls this Canal type product inserted in the ear canal "in-ear monitor". The inner ear type is a conventional type that hooks outside the ear canal after WALKMAN of SONY, but the overhead type which was common before that is giving out a sound outside the earlobe, in the nuance named in the earlobe "inner ear It is said to be type. The SONY which created that word recently became to be used for the canal type and the notation confusion has occurred, so it is good to unify them to names that do not lead to misunderstanding (incidentally Panasonic is "Inside phone" is called). Manufacturer agency, Vine sample provider, dealer, believer ... Even if you do such a self-made work, you just lower Fender's reputation.

Upon receiving the above mentioned points, multiple reviews have been suddenly deleted, leaving one.

I usually use canal type (silicon chip sealed type) and inner ear type (pad open type) depending on the situation considering characteristics and advantages and disadvantages, but it is effective for sound leakage prevention as the spread of smartphone Canal type earphone has become extremely difficult to increase makers and product numbers with a tremendous momentum, judging only by brand and price. Even if individual preference or tendency to sound quality is subtracted, there is no proportional relationship between product price and sound quality, so it is difficult to choose. Until now, for the canal type, it has been mostly the impression that "low frequencies stay more than necessary", "high tones lose transparency" and "separation of sounds is low". I thought that the more popular the low-priced products, the more the traditional inner ear type was better reproducibility from bass to treble, but this relatively expensive product exceeding 10,000 yen I was betrayed in a good way. There is no unpleasant reverberation feeling that bass and treble mix in the stopped ears. It sounds a very clear sound. I think that such earphone without peculiarity is suitable because it is necessary to grasp various elements of sound for monitoring in music production. When performing overdubbing in the remix work, I felt that delicate response such as editing mistake etc. which was not noticed by the monitor earphone which used so far is also characterized as soon as possible. Just listening to existing music (downloading, streaming, CD, etc.) can be done by selecting in advance the earphone suitable for that sound that matches your favorite genre, so for users seeking dynamic sounds, This product which is superior in depicting detail with depiction may feel somewhat unsatisfactory. Except for those who produce something myself regardless of professional or amateurs, I feel that there is absolutely no need to use this product to be honest. I do not understand this design intention, it is beyond my expectation to listen and compare the good or bad of the sounds under the same conditions, and it is unexpected that users with arbitrary belief