Thin, cheap, recommended

Purchased for protection of used lens (Minolta). Thanks to the Golden line, it seems that cheap lens looks a bit luxurious. Although it may be difficult to install due to processing accuracy problems if it is an inexpensive product, this product could be installed smoothly without such a problem. I do not know about coating performance, but this is enough for protection. If you are looking for an inexpensive one with a thin filter, it is recommended.

It may be thin

Because it is thin, it does not disrupt the balance and has no discomfort. It is cheap, enough for lens protection and transparency is also good. It is recommended.

Thin frame and cheap!

I tried Pro1D as a thin frame filter, but in our old Tamron 17 - 35 mm / 2.8 - 4, since the four corners were distinctly keraed, it was purchased under no good. Then it was in a state of usable with only a few crackles! (Vignetting is not "zero", but if it narrows down to F4, it does not matter at all) There may also be compatibility, but I think that value worth considering is "there" from the price. Later, I pray that there is nothing that is "too thin" in other oysters. However, I bought two pieces because it is cheap, so I think whether there is a problem for a while.

Is good

It's cheap. Three 52 mm 3 mm for AF Nikkor 28, 35, 50 mm purchased second hand for preventing adhesion of dust rather than lens protection. It was not planned to be used because it was second - handed, but it was a superb thing to mistake whether all three were brand - new ... (haha). It is certainly thin, depending on the lens it seems not to be seen from the side but you can see that it is wearing with gold pin stripes.

NIKKOR 10 - 20 mm f / 4.5 - 5.6 G to VR.

Installed in NIKON NIKKOR 10 - 20 mm f / 4.5 - 5.6 G VR. Since it also protects the lens, I always want to attach it. Since the wide-angle lens is closer to the subject than I thought, it may become a considerable close-up if I notice it. I do not want to get scratches or dirt on the front ball, so as soon as I bought a new lens I will install it for protection purposes. There is a sense of security.

It is good!

I used polarizing filters for cameras, but vignetting is worrisome. There are many times when it can not be confirmed by self-shooting of video, and when I edit at home, there were many "disappointments", but I can shoot it without worrying about it. Since the direction of rotation is also one, I use a lens hood attached. Cospar is also nice.

Is it cheap so good?

Level that does not understand the difference compared with Kenko's PRO1 etc. Working accuracy of the thin frame is also great, there is no point of complaint. I can not find the reason to buy a filter expensive product. I also bought a C - PL filter, but it works well. I think it is a reliable manufacturer.

It is a bargain.

UV filter and sky light filter etc are better if you can purchase at this amount if there are many cases where the objective of lens protection is mainly chosen rather than its effect.